Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove deprecated model_size from LightningModule #12641

Merged

Conversation

tkonopka
Copy link
Contributor

@tkonopka tkonopka commented Apr 6, 2022

What does this PR do?

Part of #12521

resolves #8343

Primary change:

  • removed the deprecated model_size property/method from the LightningModule class

Associated edits:

  • removed "model_size" from an internal list of __jit_unused_properties__
  • removed an import made redundant by the above edits
  • removed a unit test associated with the removed method
  • removed a few lines of documentation describing the removed method
  • updated the changelog

Notes:

Following a suggestion from @kaushikb11 in one of the comments in #12521, a search for ".model_size" on grep.app gave 438 hits. This pattern is quite generic, so it is not surprising there are many hits not related to lightning or to this PR. I browsed through them, quickly omitting cases attempting to assign a model size rather than retrieve it and cases where a model size was compared to strings. I investigated the others for signs of importing lightning or including lightning in the repo requirements file. The only proper hit I found was a repository intel-analytics/BigDL. The authors seem to be already aware that the model_size property is deprecated (see here), so no further action taken.

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.

  • removed property model_size in the LightningModule class

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • [n/a] Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

@mergify mergify bot added the ready PRs ready to be merged label Apr 6, 2022
@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 enabled auto-merge (squash) April 6, 2022 17:20
@akihironitta akihironitta added breaking change Includes a breaking change lightningmodule pl.LightningModule labels Apr 7, 2022
@akihironitta akihironitta added this to the 1.7 milestone Apr 7, 2022
@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 merged commit fcea720 into Lightning-AI:master Apr 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking change Includes a breaking change lightningmodule pl.LightningModule ready PRs ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deprecate the model_size property on the LightningModule
7 participants